<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter Followers Don&#8217;t Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikemacleod.net/2009/01/19/why-twitter-followers-dont-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikemacleod.net/2009/01/19/why-twitter-followers-dont-matter/</link>
	<description>Social media, research, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:56:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cavs</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemacleod.net/2009/01/19/why-twitter-followers-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-6252</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cavs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemacleod.net/?p=166#comment-6252</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that you say this. Over the last few years, Twitter certainly has become a tool for conversation. It did, however, start out as a broadcast tool. The whole, &quot;What are you doing?&quot; question certainly lent itself to broadcast messages. It was the users who defined what Twitter would become, and what it will become in the future. This may be a question of semantics, but I think it&#039;s worth mentioning when you declare what Twitter is or is not. 

As far as broadcasting a message, in some instances, broadcast works well. For example, the user @BreakingNewsOn is pretty much a broadcaster. There is very little interaction with the user base, yet they have many followers, and are arguably a valuable addition to the twitter community. 

I understand that you&#039;re talking about marketers, but your first sentence is then very misleading. Twitter most certainly IS a broadcast medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you say this. Over the last few years, Twitter certainly has become a tool for conversation. It did, however, start out as a broadcast tool. The whole, &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221; question certainly lent itself to broadcast messages. It was the users who defined what Twitter would become, and what it will become in the future. This may be a question of semantics, but I think it&#8217;s worth mentioning when you declare what Twitter is or is not. </p>
<p>As far as broadcasting a message, in some instances, broadcast works well. For example, the user @BreakingNewsOn is pretty much a broadcaster. There is very little interaction with the user base, yet they have many followers, and are arguably a valuable addition to the twitter community. </p>
<p>I understand that you&#8217;re talking about marketers, but your first sentence is then very misleading. Twitter most certainly IS a broadcast medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coach Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.mikemacleod.net/2009/01/19/why-twitter-followers-dont-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-5545</link>
		<dc:creator>Coach Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikemacleod.net/?p=166#comment-5545</guid>
		<description>Very interesting perspective. I am learning more about Twitter every day.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Coach Jenn&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PersonalFitCoach/~3/mYNhyzJ-yHk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Busting Weight Loss Plateaus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting perspective. I am learning more about Twitter every day.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Coach Jenn&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PersonalFitCoach/~3/mYNhyzJ-yHk/" rel="nofollow">Busting Weight Loss Plateaus</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
